FREE MASTERCLASS: Learn Faster and Retain More · Watch it free →
From the Science of Accelerated Evolution
Career & Business · how to learn faster
You Are Using the Right Methods. You Are Not Learning at the Speed You Want. Here Is Why.
Two people finish the same course. One applies what was taught in new situations the following week. One goes back to the notes. The method was identical. The state was not. Antano Solar John's fractionation mechanism reveals that the speed of learning is not a function of technique. It is a function of how deeply the unconscious system is engaged. When a skill cycles from conscious attention into unconscious processing and back, each cycle deepens the installation. The person exerting the least conscious effort is often learning the fastest.
Antano & HariniPersonal Evolution Scientists · Watch + read
Short on time? The video shows the change happen live. The article below walks it step by step.
The things to take from this
001Speed and scale are functions of the unconscious
Antano Solar John mirrors people, analog marks stories, and tracks breathing shifts simultaneously. None of it is done consciously. Each skill was practiced obsessively until it became innate, then handed to the unconscious. That transfer is what makes speed possible. Conscious processing has a ceiling. Unconscious processing does not.
002Fractionation deepens each learning cycle
A person put into trance on day one and brought back ten days later goes deeper than someone who went daily. A person fractioned five times in one session goes deeper still. The same principle applies to any skill. Full focus on one thing, then full focus on something else, then back. Each return deepens what was there before.
003Adding more techniques increases cognitive load, not learning speed
When conscious attention is split across multiple methods, each method gets less processing. The person doing one thing with complete absorption installs it faster than the person running three techniques simultaneously. The right state reduces cognitive load, making the same exposure produce a far deeper result.
004The break is not a break
Chinese martial arts masters sent black belts away for a year before their next level. When they returned, they were better than when they left. The unconscious continued processing what the conscious mind had set down. The learning did not stop when the practice stopped. It went deeper.
Part 01
The Two People in the Same Classroom
Two people sit in the same room, listening to the same instructor, taking the same notes. The course ends. Three weeks later, one of them is applying what was taught in situations the instructor never described.
The other is back at the notes, looking for the answer. Same information. Same time.
Different output. The difference is not intelligence. It is not attention. It is the state each person was in when the information arrived.
This is the question that techniques do not answer. Techniques address what you do with information after it arrives. They give you better ways to encode, review, and retrieve.
What they do not address is why some people absorb material quickly and deeply while others absorb it slowly and shallowly from the same input. The techniques are the same. The state is not.
Antano Solar John describes a principle he calls speed and scale as a function of the unconscious. The person who learns fastest is not the one running the primary sophisticated method. It is the one whose unconscious system is primary engaged with the material.
When the unconscious is processing, the speed is different from anything the conscious mind can produce. The conscious mind processes sequentially. The unconscious processes in parallel, and it does not get tired.
This changes the question. Instead of asking what technique to use, the better question is what state allows the unconscious system to engage fully with what is being learned. That question has a different answer, and it points toward a different kind of work.
Part 02
Fractionation: The Mechanism Behind Compressed Timelines
The fractionation concept came from hypnosis research. When a subject was put into a trance, woken, and brought back the next day, they went deeper than on the first session. Brought back on the third day, deeper still.
On the tenth day, far deeper than the first. The deepening was cumulative. Each entry built on what the previous entry had established.
Then the researchers tried something different. Instead of spacing the sessions across days, they fractioned the same session. Put the subject into a trance.
Woke them up. Spoke to them about something unrelated. Put them back into a trance.
Five cycles in a single sitting produced depth that exceeded ten consecutive daily sessions. The pattern held: full engagement, then something else entirely, then return. Each return went deeper than the one before.
Antano Solar John applies this directly to learning any skill. You practice pacing and leading obsessively until it becomes innate. Then you do something else with full focus.
Then you return. The return does not bring you back to where you were. It takes you deeper.
The skill has continued to process in the background during the interval. When you come back, the installation has advanced without any additional conscious effort.
The martial arts example makes this visible. When Chinese martial arts students earned a black belt and were ready for the next level, the master would send them away for a year. No martial arts.
Come back. When they returned, they were demonstrably better than when they had left. The unconscious kept working.
The practice had stopped. The learning had not. The year away was not a break from learning.
It was a different phase of the same learning process, running underneath everything else the student was doing.
The pattern, as a circuit. One trigger, and it runs the full loop on its own. A pattern runs from one source. That is why it returns no matter how much effort goes in at the surface.
Part 03
Why Adding More Techniques Does Not Accelerate Learning
The distinction
The standard response to not learning fast enough is to add more structure. Take better notes. Use spaced repetition.
Try the Feynman technique. Add a retrieval practice session. Each addition is reasonable on its own.
Together, they increase the cognitive load on the conscious system. The conscious system is now managing the material and managing the methods. Neither gets full attention.
Antano Solar John practices mirroring, analog marking, tracking breathing and skin colour shifts, and monitoring his own body state simultaneously during a session. But none of this is conscious. Each capability was developed one at a time, practiced until it became innate, then handed to the unconscious.
Now they run in parallel without any conscious management. He describes it as being like breathing. You do not decide to breathe. It happens because the system handles it.
The person who tries to mirror, analog mark, and track breathing all at once, consciously, will fail at all three. The cognitive load prevents depth in any of them. This is exactly what happens when someone stacks multiple learning techniques simultaneously.
Each technique gets surface processing. Nothing installs deeply. The feeling at the end of the session is that a lot of work was done. The test two weeks later reveals how little stayed.
The alternative is not laziness. It is a different kind of discipline. Pick one skill.
Practice it with complete absorption until the conscious mind no longer has to manage it. Then add the next. The depth at which each skill installs when it gets full focus is incomparable to the shallow installation that happens when attention is split.
Two techniques used one at a time, with full absorption at each stage, produce more than ten techniques used simultaneously.
Part 04
What Changes When the State Changes
John Grinder was in Brighton, working through a line of people, when a woman asked him a question. He answered, asked her to stay nearby, and continued to other people. As he talked to someone else, the woman began cycling between crying and laughing, back and forth, until something released.
She came back and said he had changed her life. Grinder had not consciously tracked her during that time. When asked whether he had done it consciously, he said: systematically, yes. Consciously, no.
This is the distinction that matters for learning speed. Systematic does not mean conscious. A system can be built consciously and then handed to the unconscious, where it runs without management.
The speed at which Grinder processed the room, tracked multiple people, and created change without deliberate focus on any one person is what an installed system looks like in operation. It cannot be faked by conscious effort. It can only be produced by a system that has been built carefully and then released.
For a learner, the implication is direct. The speed at which you acquire a new skill is a reflection of the state your system is in when you practice. A person in a low-access state, with attention split and the background running interference, installs slowly.
A person in a high-access state, with the unconscious engaged and the conscious mind clear, installs quickly. Same material. Same time.
Different depth. The state is the variable that techniques miss, because techniques address what you do, not what state you are in when you do it.
Antano Solar John's fractionation approach changes this by working with the structure of learning itself. The cycle of full engagement, followed by something else entirely, followed by return, is not a scheduling trick. It is a mechanism that actively deepens installation with each cycle.
The person using this approach is not trying harder. They are working with how the unconscious system actually processes new capability. That alignment between method and mechanism is what produces the results that look, from the outside, like extraordinary speed.
Free video series
Watch Antano work with this pattern live
The video series shows the session dynamic in full, including exactly where the intervention lands and what changes in the person in the room.
Surface work bounces. Advice, effort and willpower operate at the level of conscious thought, so they bounce off. The pattern runs one level below. Change it there, and the old loop has nothing left to run on.A × T = C™. Antano and Harini's formula: Adjustment times Time equals Consequences. Effort on the wrong adjustment barely moves the needle in decades. The right adjustment, made once at the source, compounds for years.
Free masterclass
Watch the change happen in one real person
One free masterclass with Antano Solar John. The shift that changes this exact pattern at its source.
FractionationA learning mechanism in which full focus on a skill, followed by a break to something entirely different, followed by return to the original skill, produces deeper installation than continuous practice. Each cycle of fractionation advances the skill further than the previous cycle.
Unconscious ProcessA capability that runs automatically without conscious management. Walking, breathing, and mirroring in skilled practitioners are all unconscious processes. When a skill becomes unconscious, it no longer consumes conscious attention and can run in parallel with other activities.
StateThe internal condition from which a person encounters new information. State determines how deeply the unconscious engages with incoming material. Two people in the same learning environment in different states will install the same material at very different depths.
InstallationA change at the level of unconscious patterning that produces new capability without requiring conscious execution of steps. A skill is installed when it runs automatically, in the way walking or writing the alphabet runs automatically for an adult.
Cognitive LoadThe demand placed on conscious attention by the number of things being managed simultaneously. High cognitive load prevents deep installation of any individual skill. Reducing cognitive load by focusing on one thing completely allows that thing to install at greater depth.
Questions people ask
What is the fastest way to learn something new?
The fastest learning happens when the unconscious system fully engages with the material. This requires reducing the cognitive load on the conscious mind, not increasing it. Fractionation, the practice of focused engagement followed by a complete break and then return, deepens each learning cycle without additional effort. The speed comes from working with the structure of unconscious processing, not from pushing harder through conscious repetition.
How can I learn faster without studying more?
Study time is not the constraint. State and depth of processing are. The same material studied in a high-access state installs far more deeply than the same material covered in a divided-attention state. Fractionation, doing something entirely different between learning sessions, allows the unconscious to continue processing during the interval. When you return, you are further along than when you left, without any additional study time.
Does multitasking while learning slow you down?
Conscious multitasking prevents depth in any individual skill. The apparent multitasking that skilled practitioners achieve is not simultaneous conscious processing. It is the parallel running of multiple unconscious systems, each built through focused single-task practice until it became innate. Trying to run multiple learning techniques simultaneously keeps all of them at surface level. One thing practiced to depth installs more than many things practiced shallowly.
Why do I learn something quickly in a class and forget it a week later?
Forgetting quickly after learning is a sign of shallow installation. The material was processed consciously but did not transfer to the unconscious system. This happens when attention is divided, when cognitive load is high, or when the state from which the material arrived did not allow deep processing. Fractionation, active retrieval across spaced intervals, and reducing distractions all push installation deeper. But the primary significant variable is the state at the moment of learning.
Is there a technique that actually makes you learn faster?
Techniques operate on top of state. Within a given state, retrieval practice, spaced repetition, and interleaving improve retention. They do not change the speed of installation itself. What changes installation speed is the state from which learning happens. A state of genuine absorption and full engagement, without background interference, produces deep installation quickly. That state can be created intentionally. When it is, the same techniques produce results that look dramatically different.
The full session, in text
Read the full transcriptFor readers and search engines
My question is that can the person multitask? Are you breathing as you talk to me? Yeah, I mean leave apart the unconscious thing. I mean unconscious is very strange. So why don't you leave everything you want to multitask to your unconscious? Because you can't... Why not? So you remember yesterday I spoke to you about something very important. Yesterday I told you speed and scale is the function of your unconscious. So for me when I want to multitask, I would be fully focused on something until it becomes innate. And then I will exactly do what you just said. After that skill becomes innate, I will leave it to my unconscious. So just to give you some quick examples of multitasking. Yesterday you remember I spoke to you about pacing and leading? Okay. Now my stance over here, who do you think I'm pacing? It's not my posture. I don't stand like this. I'm resembling you. But if she's going to continue to move in the way she's moving right now, my hands will automatically start moving like this. So my body posture will match you, but my hands will start matching her. So that when I stop moving my hands, she stops moving her hands. Now do I do that consciously? What do you think? At this point in time, for me, mirroring someone has become an unconscious process. So to me it's just like breathing. Just like you can't stop breathing, I can't stop mirroring. If I want to influence a person. So if I'm in front of you, I won't come in the way of myself mirroring. I'll give you an example. There was a Delhi batch where I was working on someone. And I was telling a story to a particular group. And the story was a sad story. And I don't even know why I said that story, but I was saying the story on the left hand side, back behind. I saw a lady remove her ring and put it on the table. Now until then my attention was not on her. In fact, when I'm talking to you, I get into what is called tunnel vision. I only see you. But then my unconscious mind is watching for cues that I would have consciously been interested in. So as soon as her fingers went there, my attention shifted there. I was looking here, but my peripheral vision shifted there. So I was telling a story here, but my attention was going there. Now if I ever have to try to do these kinds of things consciously, trust me, I will go mad. I cannot. I simply cannot. So the way I do it is I practice pacing and leading. Obsessively, compulsively. Until it becomes innate. Then it becomes like breathing. No matter what I do in life, I am watching. No matter where I am, I am mirroring. Now in addition to that, I do something called as analog marking. Which is, let's say I'm telling you a story. Within the story, I can vocally mark out certain words. And those words that are differently marked out form a command for your unconscious mind. That's a very complex process. So let's say I want to mark out the words, feel comfortable now. I'll say, you know, this morning when I woke up, I had this strange feel that this batch is going to be exciting to me. Now I was having this comfort of lying in the bed, but my mind was always thinking about what's going to happen in the batch. And now that I'm here, now did you hear the marking of those three words? I exaggerated it for you to catch. Feel comfort now. Now it's slightly off, but feel uncomfortable there. Now every time I tell a story, I'm analog marking. So the parallel tasking that I personally do, and you ask about my experience of parallel tasking, the parallel tasking that I personally do involves coming up with a metaphor. Involves inside the metaphor marking out commands. Involves being an unconscious rapport by mirroring. Involves being alert to shift in breathing patterns, changes in skin color, visually. And it also involves being physically alert to any shift in my body. For example, if I start talking to you and I suddenly feel a neck ache, my head would go, where did I get that from? And I would put my attention on whoever is having the headache at that particular moment. Now everything that I'm telling you, it is for me impossible to do it consciously. Just not possible. So my theory on multitasking is, get focused on something, do it obsessively-compulsively until it becomes innate. And then let those things happen parallel in your unconscious. And I think I learned that lesson from John Grindlew, I remember when I was with him in Brighton, there was this long line, and I was just standing next to him, and there was this girl who came and asked him a question. And John answered something, but asked her to stay around, and he was talking to somebody else. And as he was talking, she starts crying. And laughing. And crying. And laughing. And then crying. And laughing. And I said, thank you John so much, you changed my life. So I said, John, did you do that consciously? He said, systematically? Yes. Consciously? No. So I'm bringing a distinction here between conscious and systematic. A lot of times when we use the word unconscious or subconscious, it appears like it's a magic trick, it's something without a structure. I'm proposing the exact opposite. I'm saying you have a system, you have a structure, you repeat it again and again, and then that system, that structure becomes unconscious. So that's my first take on your question. And it's an interesting question, what do you think about multitasking? My first to ask is, there are a lot of things I'm already multitasking, like breathing, like managing the metabolism of my body. And my unconscious mind is doing that, my neurology is doing that, it's making moment by moment decision. If there is a danger outside, I make a moment by moment decision to change everything so that I could run the... So the unconscious is making moment by moment decision. There are a lot of things that are going on parallel. Why not take the things we want to do every day and make that an unconscious process? Do you have examples of this from your own personal life? Yes, you do. Walking is an example of that. When you first learned to walk, it was a conscious process. Writing is an example of that. When you learn to write, when you see that letter as a child, you see yourself holding a pen and a pencil, and you write the letter A and B and C, it's a conscious process. After enough repetition, it becomes unconscious. The beauty of it becoming unconscious is it allows you to scale up. Now you don't have to think in letters, you can think in words. So scale and speed comes as a function of unconscious process. And I'm insisting on the word speed because I think when you're multitasking, speed matters. How many of you remember that Windows 3.1, if you've ever used it? There was this... Long time ago you had this operating system. So before Windows 3.1 came, you had this thing called DOS. It was a black screen, and you can open one application at a time. So when Windows was launched, their marketing line was, hey, it's a multitasking thing. You can play a game, and on the other side you can send a mail, and these two things are happening parallelly. Now what Windows really did, and in Bill Gates' own words, was they were using a CPU that shared time, which means if there are three applications open, they divide a second into thousand milliseconds, and 20 milliseconds for the first application, stop. Next 20 milliseconds to the second application, stop this too. Next 20 milliseconds to the third application, stop that too. Go back to the first application. So all Windows was doing was it was doing one thing at a time, but the transition was so fast that it made us feel that it's a multitasking thing. So when I'm pointing out speed as a function of unconscious process, my intention is to bring to your attention that if you really want to multitask, you want to be able to do it way faster. Like when you write A, B, C, D right now, you don't take as much time as you took when you wrote as a child. So when you're writing a word, it just flows out. The second thing about multitasking is I want to bring your attention to this concept called fractionation. It's a very, very, very important concept for learning, for sales, for everything. Now the fractionation concept started from hypnosis actually. One of the things they found out was early days, when hypnotists would hypnotize people, they had various measurements of how deep someone is in a trance. So the way they did it is they would put someone into a trance and then they would wake them up and then they would ask them to come on day two and they would put them in a trance and they would measure and realize that the person has gone deeper than they went on the first day. Then they would wake them up. Then they would put them in a trance on the third day and then the person would go deeper and when the person wakes up, they're much more deeper in a trance and when they put them on the fourth day, they go way deep. Six days, seven days, eight days, ten days, the process makes the person on the tenth day to go much, much more deeper than they were on the first day. You understand so far. Now comes the interesting thing. What John and Richard did is they took a guy, they put him in a trance, they woke him up, they spoke to him about random things and put him in a trance again and guess what happened? He went just as deep, just as deep as the guy who went in the second day. And when they did this five times, they would put him to sleep, woke him up, put him to sleep, put him to sleep, woke him up, put him to sleep, woke him up, in the fifth time, they went more deeper than someone who went into a trance for ten days. And this concept in hypnosis is called Fractionation. What it really means is that if you do something with full focus, you do anything else with full focus and if you come back to what you were originally doing, your focus would deepen. Your understanding would deepen. So I'll repeat that again. So you do whatever you do with full focus and you do anything else, not that. And then if you come back to what you were doing originally, your focus would go deeper than it was the first time. One of the phenomena that surprises me a lot is that back in those days in China when they used to make martial arts a sport, I mean a serious sport, they had this ritual that when someone would become a don, like black belt and then they become a degree higher, the master would tell the person to take a one-year break and come back. He would say, go do anything else, don't do martial arts and come back. And what surprised me is to know that when these people used to come back, apparently they would be better in shape and form than they were before they took that break.
Before You Go
The article names the pattern. The masterclass changes it.
